United States of America v. Sakai

Filing 18

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART THE UNITED STATES' PETITION TO ENFORCE IRS SUMMONSES 14 . Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 6/28/2011. (afc)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ALLEN H. SAKAI, as President of ) STRATEGIC MEDICAL ) CONSULTING, INC., ALLEN H. ) SAKAI, ROBERT R. LAI, and ) SUSAN C. SAKAI,, ) ) Defendants. ) _____________________________ ) 1:11-CV-00217 LEK-RLP ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART THE UNITED STATES’ PETITION TO ENFORCE IRS SUMMONSES ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART THE UNITED STATES’ PETITION TO ENFORCE IRS SUMMONSES Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties on June 7, 2011, and no objections having been filed by any party, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the Findings and Recommendation are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, June 28, 2011. /S/ Leslie E. Kobayashi Leslie E. Kobayashi United States District Judge cc:all parties of record USA V. ALLEN H. SAKAI, ET AL; CIVIL NO. 11-00217 LEK-RLP; ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART THE UNITED STATES’ PETITION TO ENFORCE IRS SUMMONSES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?