Nelson et al v. Crane Company et al

Filing 69

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 65 . Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 10/6/2011. (afc)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications will be served by first class mail on October 7, 2011.

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII IN RE: HAWAII STATE ASBESTOS CASES ) ) ) ) This Document Applies To: ) ROGER E. NELSON and ROSALIE ) ) J. NELSON, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) CRANE COMPANY, etc., et al., ) ) ) Defendants. _____________________________ ) CIVIL NO. 11-00405 LEK-BMK ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Before the Court is Plaintiffs Roger E. Nelson and Rosalie J. Nelson’s (“Plaintiffs”) Motion for Reconsideration (“Motion”), filed on September 27, 2011. On September 30, 2011, this Court issued an EO which, inter alia, found the Motion suitable for disposition without a hearing pursuant to Rule LR7.2(d) of the Local Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Hawai`i (“Local Rules”). The Court also stated that it would rule on the Motion without any further briefing from the parties. After careful consideration of the Motion and the relevant legal authority, Plaintiffs’ Motion is HEREBY DENIED for the reasons set forth in this Court’s Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration, filed in CV 11-00400 LEK-KSC on October 6, 2011. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED AT HONOLULU, HAWAII, October 6, 2011. /S/ Leslie E. Kobayashi Leslie E. Kobayashi United States District Judge IN RE: HAWAII STATE ASBESTOS CASES; ROGER E. NELSON, ET AL. V. CRANE CO., ET AL; CIVIL NO. 11-00405 LEK-BMK; ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?