Nelson et al v. Crane Company et al
Filing
69
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 65 . Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 10/6/2011. (afc)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications will be served by first class mail on October 7, 2011.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
IN RE: HAWAII STATE ASBESTOS
CASES
)
)
)
)
This Document Applies To:
)
ROGER E. NELSON and ROSALIE
)
)
J. NELSON,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
CRANE COMPANY, etc., et al., )
)
)
Defendants.
_____________________________ )
CIVIL NO. 11-00405 LEK-BMK
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
Before the Court is Plaintiffs Roger E. Nelson and
Rosalie J. Nelson’s (“Plaintiffs”) Motion for Reconsideration
(“Motion”), filed on September 27, 2011.
On September 30, 2011,
this Court issued an EO which, inter alia, found the Motion
suitable for disposition without a hearing pursuant to Rule
LR7.2(d) of the Local Rules of Practice of the United States
District Court for the District of Hawai`i (“Local Rules”).
The
Court also stated that it would rule on the Motion without any
further briefing from the parties.
After careful consideration
of the Motion and the relevant legal authority, Plaintiffs’
Motion is HEREBY DENIED for the reasons set forth in this Court’s
Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration, filed in CV
11-00400 LEK-KSC on October 6, 2011.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED AT HONOLULU, HAWAII, October 6, 2011.
/S/ Leslie E. Kobayashi
Leslie E. Kobayashi
United States District Judge
IN RE: HAWAII STATE ASBESTOS CASES; ROGER E. NELSON, ET AL. V.
CRANE CO., ET AL; CIVIL NO. 11-00405 LEK-BMK; ORDER DENYING
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?