Au v. Funding Group Inc., The et al

Filing 107

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 99 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 3/21/13. (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Ronald Au served by first class mail at the address of record on March 21, 2013.

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII RONALD AU, Plaintiff, vs. THE FUNDING GROUP, INC.; AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC., nka Homeward Residential, Inc.; OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION, nka Sand Canyon Corporation; DOE DEFENDANTS 1-10; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10, Defendants. _____________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CV 11-00541 SOM-KSC ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties on February 20, 2013, and no objections having been filed by any party, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the "Findings and Recommendation to Grant in Part and Deny in Part Defendant Homeward Residential, Inc., formerly known as American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs" are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. APPROVED AND SO ORDERED. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, March 21, 2013. /s/ Susan Oki Mollway Susan Oki Mollway Chief United States District Judge RONALD AU v. THE FUNDING GROUP, INC.; AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC., nka Homeward Residential, Inc.; OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION, nka Sand Canyon Corporation; DOE DEFENDANTS 1-10; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10; CV 11-00541 SOM-KSC ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?