Virchinsky v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co.

Filing 22

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 19 . Signed by JUDGE DAVID ALAN EZRA on 3/8/2012. ~ ORDER Adopts the Findings and Recommendation to Deny Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Case back to Circuit Cou rt State of Hawaii ~ (afc)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII CHESTER S. VIRCHINSKY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) MUTUAL OF OMAHA ) INSURANCE CO., ) ) Defendant. ) _____________________________ ) CIVIL 12-00025-DAE-BMK ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Findings and Recommendation having been filed on February 16, 2012, and served concurrently upon those counsel of record who are registered participants of CM/ECF, and served on February 17, 2012 by First Class Mail to those parties of record who are not registered participants of CM/ECF, and no objections having been filed by any party IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the “FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND CASE BACK TO FIRST CIRCUIT COURT STATE OF HAWAII,” docket entry no. 19, are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, March 8, 2012. _____________________________ David Alan Ezra United States District Judge Chester S. Virchinsky vs. Mututal of Omaha Insurance Co., Civil No. 12-00025 DAE-BMK; ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?