Jim Aana; et al. vs. Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.

Filing 1158

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION for ( 1157 in 1:12-cv-00231-LEK-BMK). Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 08/03/2016. the "Findings and Recommendation To Dismiss Claims B y Plaintiffs Wendell Kabutan And Wanda Kabutan" filed on July 12, 2016; (ECF NO. 1157 ) Associated Cases: 1:12-cv-00231-LEK-BMK, 1:12-cv-00655-LEK-BMK(eps )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants reg istered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications served by first class mail on August 4, 2016

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII JIM AANA, ET AL.,on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) PIONEER HI-BRED ) INTERNATIONAL, ET. AL., ) ) Defendants. ) _____________________________ ) AND RELATED CONSOLIDATED ) CASE. ) CIV NO. 12-00231 LEK-BMK CIV NO. 12-00655 LEK-BMK [CONSOLIDATED CASES] ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties on July 12, 2016, and no objections having been filed by any party, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the "Findings and Recommendation To Dismiss Claims By Plaintiffs Wendell Kabutan And Wanda Kabutan" filed on July 12, 2016; (ECF NO. [1157]) are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED AT HONOLULU, HAWAII, August 3, 2016. /s/ Leslie E. Kobayashi Leslie E. Kobayashi United States District Judge JIM AANA, ET AL. VS. PIONEER HI-BRED INTERNATIONAL, ET AL; CIVIL 1200231 LEK-BMK; CIVIL 12-00655 LEK-BMK; ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?