United States of America v. 2004 White Nissan Titan SE

Filing 16

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 15 . Signed by JUDGE ALAN C KAY on 2/28/2013. ~ Findings andRecommendation To Grant Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion For Entry of DefaultJudgment And Decree Of Forfeiture" ; are adopted as the opinion andorder of this Court. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) 2004 WHITE NISSAN TITAN SE ) BEARING HAWAII LICENSE ) PLATE NUMBER RRU 223 AND ) VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION ) NUMBER 1N6AA07A94N525550 , ) ) Defendant. ) _____________________________ ) CIV NO 12-00387 ACK-KSC ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties on February 07, 2013, and no objections having been filed by any party, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the "Findings and Recommendation To Grant Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion For Entry of Default Judgment And Decree Of Forfeiture" (ECF No. 15) are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai’i, February 28, 2013. ________________________________ Alan C. Kay Sr. United States District Judge U.S. v. 2004 White Nissan Titan SE Bearing Hawaii License Plate Number RRU 223 and Vehicle Identification Number 1N6AA07A94N525550, Civ. No. 12-00387 ACK-KSC: Order Adopting Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?