Broyles v. Bank of America Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
34
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION re: 33 . Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 3/28/2013. ~ Order adopts the "ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM THE ENTRY OF DEFAULT F ILED OCTOBER 26, 2012 AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY AS MOOT PLAINTIFF'S SECOND MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT." 20 , 16 . ~ (afc) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to rece ive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
MARYANN ROSE BROYLES,
INDIVIDUALLY AND AS COTRUSTEE OF THE MARYANN
ROSE BROYLES REVOCABLE
TRUST,
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
BANK OF AMERICA BANK, N.A.; )
and WELLS FARGO BANK; N.A., )
)
Defendants.
)
_____________________________ )
CIVIL 12-00426-LEK-KSC
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties
on February 20, 2013, and no objections having been filed by any party,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28,
United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the “ORDER
GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM THE ENTRY OF
DEFAULT FILED OCTOBER 26, 2012 AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION TO DENY AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S SECOND
MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT,” docket entry no. 33, are adopted as the
opinion and order of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED AT HONOLULU, HAWAII, March 28, 2013.
/S/ Leslie E. Kobayashi
Leslie E. Kobayashi
United States District Judge
MARY ANN ROSE BROYLES, ETC. V. BANK OF AMERICA BANK, N.A., ET AL;
CIVIL NO. 12-00426 LEK-KSC; ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?