Adwalls Media, LLC v. Adwalls, LLC et al

Filing 241

ORDER RE. MOTION TO STRIKE AND EXPUNGE IMPROPERLY FILED STIPULATED JUDGMENT AND FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PLAINTIFF SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF COURT. No later than September 14, 2020, Ad Walls, LLC, shall file the appropriate LR 7.8 certification and shall explain the delay in its reaction to the filing. Alternatively, Ad Walls, LLC, may file a document withdrawing the motion without prejudice to its refiling once a proper prefiling conference has been completed. For its part , Adwalls Media, LLC, shall, by September 14, 2020, submit a statement as to why the Stipulated Judgment and Order was filed without a determination by Magistrate Judge Barry Kurren "based on briefing provided to him by the parties," as required by the parties agreement. See ECF No. 240-3, PageID # 5786. Signed by JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 9/9/2020. (cib)

Download PDF
Case 1:12-cv-00614-SOM-BMK Document 241 Filed 09/09/20 Page 1 of 3 5810 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII ADWALLS MEDIA, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) AD WALLS, LLC, ) ) Defendant. ) _____________________________ ) CIVIL NO. 12-00614 SOM/BMK ORDER RE. MOTION TO STRIKE AND EXPUNGE IMPROPERLY FILED STIPULATED JUDGMENT AND FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PLAINTIFF SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF COURT ORDER RE. MOTION TO STRIKE AND EXPUNGE IMPROPERLY FILED STIPULATED JUDGMENT AND FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PLAINTIFF SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF COURT In May 2015, Plaintiff Adwalls Media, LLC, and Defendants Ad Walls, LLC, John Rowe, and Jeffrey Zimmerman entered into a settlement agreement. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, the parties filed a Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice, which the court approved as to form. See ECF No. 238. Five years later, on May 7, 2020, Plaintiff Adwalls Media filed a Stipulated Judgment and Order. The document appears to have been submitted to the electronic case file directly by counsel, rather than having been submitted to a judge’s Orders Box (e.g., Mollway_Orders@hid.uscourts.gov.), as is customary. Consequently, no judge signed or approved the judgment before it was filed. As far as the court is concerned, a judgment and purported order that is filed without any judge’s approval has no effect. Now, four months after the unsigned Stipulated Judgment and Order was filed by Plaintiff, Defendant Ad Walls, LLC, seeks to expunge the document as having been Case 1:12-cv-00614-SOM-BMK Document 241 Filed 09/09/20 Page 2 of 3 5811 PageID #: improperly filed and to have the court issue an order to show cause why Adwalls Media (and its manager, James Blinn) should not be held in contempt. See ECF No. 240. Local Rule 7.8 provides: Except in connection with discovery motions (which are governed by LR37.1), applications for temporary restraining orders or preliminary injunctions, matters in which at least one party is pro se, and motions made during trial, counsel contemplating the filing of any motion shall first contact opposing counsel to discuss thoroughly, preferably in person, the substance of the contemplated motion and any potential partial or complete resolution. The conference shall take place at least seven (7) days prior to the filing of the motion. If the parties are unable to reach a resolution which eliminates the necessity for a motion, counsel for the movant shall include in the motion a statement to the following effect: “This motion is made following the conference of counsel pursuant to LR7.8 which took place on [date].” The current motion does not have the required LR 7.8 certification or appear to fit within any of the rule’s exemptions. No later than September 14, 2020, Ad Walls, LLC, shall file the appropriate LR 7.8 certification and shall explain the delay in its reaction to the filing. Alternatively, Ad Walls, LLC, may file a document withdrawing the motion without prejudice to its refiling once a proper prefiling conference has been completed. 2 Case 1:12-cv-00614-SOM-BMK Document 241 Filed 09/09/20 Page 3 of 3 5812 PageID #: For its part, Adwalls Media, LLC, shall, by September 14, 2020, submit a statement as to why the Stipulated Judgment and Order was filed without a determination by Magistrate Judge Barry Kurren “based on briefing provided to him by the parties,” as required by the parties’ agreement. See ECF No. 240-3, PageID # 5786. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, September 9, 2020. /s/ Susan Oki Mollway Susan Oki Mollway United States District Judge ADWALLS MEDIA, LLC, vs. AD WALLS, LLC, CIVIL NO. 12-00614 SOM/BMK; ORDER RE. MOTION TO STRIKE AND EXPUNGE IMPROPERLY FILED STIPULATED JUDGMENT AND FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PLAINTIFF SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF COURT. 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?