Cayetano v. Hawaii Carpenters Union Market Recovery Fund et al
Filing
39
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION re 27 ; 38 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 3/18/13. (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
BENJAMIN J. CAYETANO,
Plaintiff,
vs.
HAWAII CARPENTERS UNION
MARKET RECOVERY FUND dba
PACIFIC RESOURCE
PARTNERSHIP; JOHN D. WHITE,
JR.; HAWAII CARPENTERS’
UNION; PACIFIC RESOURCE
PARTNERSHIP PAC; HOAKEA
COMMUNICATIONS LLC;
BARBARA J. TANABE; JIM
MCCOY; SEAN NEWCAMP;
THALIA CHOY; GERARD
SAKAMOTO; MARK KUPAHU;
WILLIE MAGLINTI; LEONARD
HOSHIJO; LANCE YOSHIMURA;
KEN KAWAMOTO; BILL
WILSON; LANCE INOUYE;
CRAIG FUKUDA; DARREN HO;
JOHN DOES 1-50; DOE ENTITIES
1-50
Defendants.
_____________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CV 12-00619 SOM-RLP
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all
parties on February 20, 2013, and no objections having been filed by any party,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to
Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the
"Findings and Recommendation to Grant Plaintiff’s Motion for Remand and Deny
Plaintiff’s Request for Attorneys’ Fees" are adopted as the opinion and order of
this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, March 18, 2013.
/s/ Susan Oki Mollway
Susan Oki Mollway
Chief United States District Judge
Cayetano v. Hawaii Carpenters Union Market Recovery Fund, et al., Civ. No. 12-00169
SOM/RLP, ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?