Cayetano v. Hawaii Carpenters Union Market Recovery Fund et al

Filing 39

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION re 27 ; 38 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 3/18/13. (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII BENJAMIN J. CAYETANO, Plaintiff, vs. HAWAII CARPENTERS UNION MARKET RECOVERY FUND dba PACIFIC RESOURCE PARTNERSHIP; JOHN D. WHITE, JR.; HAWAII CARPENTERS’ UNION; PACIFIC RESOURCE PARTNERSHIP PAC; HOAKEA COMMUNICATIONS LLC; BARBARA J. TANABE; JIM MCCOY; SEAN NEWCAMP; THALIA CHOY; GERARD SAKAMOTO; MARK KUPAHU; WILLIE MAGLINTI; LEONARD HOSHIJO; LANCE YOSHIMURA; KEN KAWAMOTO; BILL WILSON; LANCE INOUYE; CRAIG FUKUDA; DARREN HO; JOHN DOES 1-50; DOE ENTITIES 1-50 Defendants. _____________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CV 12-00619 SOM-RLP ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties on February 20, 2013, and no objections having been filed by any party, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the "Findings and Recommendation to Grant Plaintiff’s Motion for Remand and Deny Plaintiff’s Request for Attorneys’ Fees" are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, March 18, 2013. /s/ Susan Oki Mollway Susan Oki Mollway Chief United States District Judge Cayetano v. Hawaii Carpenters Union Market Recovery Fund, et al., Civ. No. 12-00169 SOM/RLP, ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?