Dimitrion et al v. Morgan Stanley Home Loans et al
Filing
75
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 74 . Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 10/6/2014. ~ "Findings and Recommendation to Grant in Part and Deny in Part Defendant's Motion for Attorneys 9; Fees and Costs" are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
MICHAEL J. DIMITRION, individually
and as Trustee of the Michael J. Dimitrion
Trust dated November 6, 1989; and TINA
MARIE DIMITRION,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
MORGAN STANLEY CREDIT
CORPORATION; MORGAN STANLEY
DEAN WITTER CREDIT
CORPORATION; MORGAN STANLEY
PRIVATE BANK, N.A.; MORGAN
STANLEY HOME LOANS; SAXON
MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC.; PHH
MORTGAGE CORPORATION; WELLS
FARGO BANK, N.A., Successor by
Merger to Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota,
N.A., as Indenture Trustee for MSDWCC
Heloc Trust 2007-1; et al.
Defendants.
_________________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL NO. 13-00125 DKW-BMK
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE=S
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties
on September 16, 2014, and no objections having been filed by any party,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28,
United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the AFindings and
Recommendation to Grant in Part and Deny in Part Defendant=s Motion for
Attorneys= Fees and Costs@ are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 6, 2014 at Honolulu, Hawai‘i.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?