Reading International, Inc. v. The Malulani Group, Limited

Filing 177

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT'S BILL OF COSTS re: 170 . Signed by JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 10/8/2014. [Bill of Costs: doc. no. 168 . Objection to Bill of Costs: doc no. 169 (afc) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII READING INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Nevada corporation, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) THE MALULANI GROUP, ) LIMITED, a Hawaii corporation, ) ) Defendant. ) _____________________________ ) CIV. NO. 13-00133 JMS-KSC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT’S BILL OF COSTS ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT’S BILL OF COSTS Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties on September 17, 2014, and no objections having been filed by any party, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the “Findings and Recommendation Regarding Plaintiff’s Objection to Defendant the /// /// /// /// /// Malulani Group, Limited’s Bill of Costs,” Doc. No. 170, are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ J. Michael Seabright J. Michael Seabright United States District Judge Reading Int’l, Inc. v. The Malulani Grp., Ltd., Civ. No. 13-00133 JMS-KSC, Order Adopting Findings and Recommendation Regarding Plaintiff’s Objection to Defendant’s Bill of Costs 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?