Mather v. Nakasone
Filing
6
ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 12/4/2013. ~ Insofar as Plaintiff has neither filed an amended complaint nor requested additional time to file her amended complaint, this Court HEREBY DISMISSES Plaintiff's Complaint WITH PREJUDICE. Insofar as there are no claims remaining in this case, the Court DIRECTS the Clerks Office to enter dismissal and to close the case. (ecs, )CERTIFICA TE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
DIANE ELIZABETH MATHER,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
KAREN T. NAKASONE, d.b.a.
)
HON. JUDGE KAREN T. NAKASONE, )
)
Defendant.
)
)
____________________________ )
CIVIL NO. 13-00436 LEK-KSC
ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE
On August 30, 2013, pro se Plaintiff Diane Elizabeth
Mather (“Plaintiff”) filed a document which this Court construed
as Plaintiff’s Complaint.
On September 5, 2013, this Court
issued its Order Dismissing Plaintiff’s Complaint Without
Prejudice (“9/5/13 Order”).
[Dkt. no. 4.]
This Court ruled that
Plaintiff’s Complaint did not plead a basis for federal
jurisdiction because the Complaint alleged only state law claims,
and the Complaint did not allege diversity of citizenship.
The
9/5/13 Order stated that, if Plaintiff chose to file an amended
complaint, she was to file it by October 4, 2013.
Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or any
other document in this case, since this Court issued the 9/5/13
Order.
This Court warned Plaintiff that, “if she fails to file
her amended complaint by October 4, 2013, or if her amended
complaint fails to address the defects identified in this Order,
this action MAY BE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”
(emphasis omitted).]
[9/5/13 Order at 6
Insofar as Plaintiff has neither filed an
amended complaint nor requested additional time to file her
amended complaint, this Court HEREBY DISMISSES Plaintiff’s
Complaint WITH PREJUDICE.
Insofar as there are no claims remaining in this case,
the Court DIRECTS the Clerk’s Office to enter dismissal and to
close the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED AT HONOLULU, HAWAII, December 4, 2013.
/s/ Leslie E. Kobayashi
Leslie E. Kobayashi
United States District Judge
DIANE ELIZABETH MATHER V. KAREN T. NAKASONE, ETC; CIVIL NO.
13-00436 LEK-KSC; ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT WITH
PREJUDICE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?