Shorter v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc. et al

Filing 36

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION re: 32 . Signed by JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 8/25/2014. [Order Adopts the "Findings and Recommendation to Deny defendant G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.'s Motion to Enforce Formal Settlement Agreement and Vacate Court Dates, and for Attorneys' Fees and Sanctions" related: 27 . (afc)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants register ed to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII WILLIAM SHORTER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) G4S SECURE SOLUTIONS (USA) ) INC., ET AL., ) ) Defendants. ) _____________________________ ) CIVIL NO. 13-00470 JMS-RLP ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties on August 5, 2014, and no objections having been filed by any party, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the “FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY DEFENDANT G4S SECURE SOLUTIONS (USA) INC.’S MOTION TO ENFORCE FORMAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND VACATE COURT DATES, AND FOR /// /// /// /// ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND SANCTIONS,” Doc. No. 32, are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, August 25, 2014. /s/ J. Michael Seabright J. Michael Seabright United States District Judge Shorter v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc., Civ. No. 13-00470 JMS-RLP, Order Adopting Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?