Ketchmark
Filing
2
ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO FILE COMPLAINT LODGED APRIL 15, 2013, PURSUANT TO PREFILING REVIEW ORDER OF FEBRUARY 24, 2011, IN CIVIL NO. 10-00725 DAE/LEK - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 4/17/13. "The Clerk of Court is or dered to retain Ketchmark's "Complaint" in the court's files as Misc. No. 13-00063 SOM/RLP. If Ketchmark is able to file a nonfrivolous pleading that states claims upon which relief can be granted, he may submit that Complaint to this court pursuant to the prefiling review order." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Truman Lee Ketchmark served by first class mail at the address of record on April 17, 2013.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
KETCHMARK, TRUMAN LEE, his
)
Heirs and Assigns, per se, in )
)
forma Pauperis
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
)
)
OBAMA, BARACK, et al. PR
U.S.A. ($2 trillion Budget); )
)
KIRK CALDWELL, et al. Mayor
)
($10 billion Budget); BILLY
)
KENOI, et al. Mayor ($365
)
Million Budget),
)
)
Defendants.
_____________________________ )
MC. NO. 13-00063 SOM/RLP
ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO FILE
COMPLAINT LODGED APRIL 15,
2013, PURSUANT TO PREFILING
REVIEW ORDER OF FEBRUARY 24,
2011, IN CIVIL NO. 10-00725
DAE/LEK
ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO FILE COMPLAINT LODGED
APRIL 15, 2013, PURSUANT TO PREFILING REVIEW ORDER
OF FEBRUARY 24, 2011, IN CIVIL NO. 10-00725 DAE/LEK
On February 24, 2011, District Judge David Alan Ezra
issued a prefiling review order regarding any proposed Complaint
that might be submitted by Truman Lee Ketchmark.
On April 15,
2013, Ketchmark submitted a document that includes the words
"Brief--Statement--Bill--Complaint for Damages."
This document
names as Defendants the President of the United States, the Mayor
of the City and County of Honolulu, and the Mayor of the County
of Hawaii.
The document refers to a lava flow that "hit my mango
and property pins,” and to "false arrests, tickets, kidnapping,
hostage holding, ransoming and acquittals."
It also includes
correspondence relating to a condominium association.
The court
cannot discern what any Defendant's actual alleged wrongdoing is
or why any Defendant is named.
Nor can the court determine when
alleged actions occurred or whether this court even has
jurisdiction.
The "Complaint" fails to state any claim upon
which relief can be granted.
Pursuant to Judge Ezra's
prefiling order, the court
determines that the "Complaint" of April 15, 2013, does not merit
further review and will not be litigated.
The Clerk of Court is
ordered to retain Ketchmark's "Complaint" in the court's files as
Misc. No. 13-00063 SOM/RLP.
If Ketchmark is able to file a
nonfrivolous pleading that states claims upon which relief can be
granted, he may submit that Complaint to this court pursuant to
the prefiling review order.
To the extent Ketchmark desires to appeal any previous
order, he shall file an appropriate document in the case being
appealed.
To the extent Ketchmark may be asking the court to lift
the prefiling order, he has failed to provide the court with any
argument supporting such a request.
The court declines to lift
the prefiling order under the present circumstances.
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, April 17, 2013.
/s/ Susan Oki Mollway
Susan Oki Mollway
Chief United States District Judge
Ketchmark v. Obama, et al.; MC. NO. 13-00063SOM/RLP, ORDER
DENYING REQUEST TO FILE COMPLAINT LODGED APRIL 15, 2013, PURSUANT
TO PREFILING REVIEW ORDER OF FEBRUARY 24, 2011, IN CIVIL NO. 1000725 DAE/LEK
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?