Takata v. Ung

Filing 16

EO: ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION TO DISTRICT COURT TO VACATE WITHDRAWAL OF REFERENCE. adopting Report and Recommendations re 15 Findings and Recommendations.. (JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI)(wnn, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE< /center>Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry

Download PDF
MINUTES CASE NUMBER: CIVIL NO. 14-00448LEK-BMK CASE NAME: Gary K. Takata, Trustee of the Laura Ngit Chau Ung Revocable Living Trust vs. Gertrude Ngit Wun Ung In Re: Gertrude Ngit Wun Ung Debtor; Case No. 13-01881 Chapter 13 ATTYS FOR PLA: ATTYS FOR DEFT: INTERPRETER: JUDGE: Leslie E. Kobayashi REPORTER: DATE: 08/24/2015 TIME: COURT ACTION: EO: ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION TO DISTRICT COURT TO VACATE WITHDRAWAL OF REFERENCE On August 4, 2015, this Court issued an entering order that extended the date for the withdrawal of reference from July 31, 2015 to August 5, 2015. [Dkt. no. 10.] On August 4, 2015, United States Bankruptcy Judge Robert J. Faris transmitted his Order Granting Motions for Summary Judgment (“Summary Judgment Order”). [Dkt. no. 11.] Before this Court is Judge Faris’s August 19, 2015 Recommendation to District Court to Vacate Withdrawal of Reference (“8/19/15 Recommendation”). [Dkt. no. 9.] It recommends that this Court vacate the withdrawal of reference so that Judge Faris may: 1) dispose of the motion for reconsideration of the Summary Judgment Order, filed on August 18, 2015; and 2) issue a final judgment. For the reasons set forth therein, this Court HEREBY ADOPTS the 8/19/15 Recommendation and VACATES the withdrawal of reference until November 24, 2015. IT IS SO ORDERED. Submitted by: Warren N. Nakamura, Courtroom Manager

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?