Cimino et al v. Kohala Zipline LLC et al
Filing
187
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION re 175 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 12/16/2016. (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electr onic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
LISA CIMINO; SAMUEL CIMINO, )
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
KOHALA ZIPLINE, LLC; HAWAII )
FOREST & TRAIL, LTD.,
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
___________________________________ )
)
KOHALA ZIPLINE, LLC,
)
)
Third-Party Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
ARBOR GLOBAL LLC; BONSAI )
DESIGN, LLC,
)
)
Third-Party Defendants. )
_____________________________ )
)
ARBOR GLOBAL LLC,
)
)
Fourth-Party Plaintiff, )
)
vs.
)
)
BONSAI DESIGN, LLC,
)
)
Fourth-Party Defendant. )
_____________________________ )
CIVIL 14-00470-JMS-KJM
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties
on November 28, 2016, and no objections having been filed by any party,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28,
United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the “FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT PLAINTIFF LISA CIMINO,
DEFENDANT AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF KOHALA ZIPLINE, LLC,
THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT ARBOR GLOBAL LLC, AND THIRD-PARTY
DEFENDANT BONSAI DESIGN, LLC’S JOINT PETITION FOR
DETERMINATION OF GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT BY AND BETWEEN
KOHALA ZIPLINE, LLC AND PLAINTIFF LISA CIMINO,” ECF No. 175, are
adopted as the opinion and order of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, December 16, 2016.
/s/ J. Michael Seabright
J. Michael Seabright
Chief United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?