Gloria of the House of Paet v. James et al

Filing 5

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 12/2/2014. ~ Plaintiff did not pay the statutory filing fee, did not file an application to proceed in forma pauperis, did not file a notice of withdrawal, and did not take any other action by the December 1, 2014 deadline. As a result, this case is hereby dismissed. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI`I GLORIA OF THE HOUSE OF PAET, AS THE UNITED STATES IN REM, ET AL. LIBERTAS, CIVIL NO. 14-00503 DKW-RLP ORDER DISMISSING CASE Plaintiff, vs. CAROL JAMES, AN INDIVIDUAL AND AS CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES, INC.; WILLIAM JAMES II, AN INDIVIDUAL AND AS CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES, INC.; KA TUMATU, AN INDIVIDUAL, ET AL., Defendants. ORDER DISMISSING CASE On October 28, 2014, Plaintiff pro se Gloria of the House of Paet filed an Admissions Statement re: Indictment for Conspiracy and Deprivation (“Admissions Statement”), but did pay the filing fee for a civil action. In its November 5, 2014 Deficiency Order, the Court directed Plaintiff to either pay the statutory filing fee, submit a fully completed and executed application to proceed in forma pauperis, or 1 file a Notice of Withdrawal by December 1, 2014. The Court cautioned Plaintiff that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute or otherwise follow a court order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Olivares v. Marshall, 59 F.3d 109, 112 (9th Cir. 1995) (stating that the district court has authority to dismiss the complaint for failure to pay partial filing fee); In re Perroton, 958 F.2d 889, 890 (9th Cir. 1992) (affirming dismissal of appeal of pro se litigant for failure to pay required filing fees). Plaintiff did not pay the statutory filing fee, did not file an application to proceed in forma pauperis, did not file a notice of withdrawal, and did not take any other action by the December 1, 2014 deadline. As a result, this case is hereby dismissed. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: December 2, 2014 at Honolulu, Hawai‘i. Gloria House of Paet v. James, et al.; Civil No. 14-00503 DKW-RLP; ORDER DISMISSING CASE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?