Samuel v. United States of America
Filing
192
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION re 191 - Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 10/3/2017. (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electroni c notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
ROSENDA SAMUEL, Individually
and as Special Administrator of the
Estate of RIENDA SUPU; and
LEWIS SAMUEL,
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff(s),
)
)
vs.
)
)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; )
JAMES MORRISON, M.D.; JOANN )
SARUBBI, M.D.; KIRK WEBER,
)
M.D.; DOE DEFENDANT 1-100,
)
)
Defendant(s).
)
_____________________________ )
)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
)
Third-Party Plaintiff
)
)
vs.
)
)
HAWAII HEALTH SYSTEMS
)
CORPORATION dba HILO
)
MEDICAL CENTER,
)
)
Third-Party Defendant )
CV 15-00141 DKW-KJM
ORDER ADOPTING
MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties
on September 15, 2017, and no objections having been filed by any party,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28,
United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the “Findings and
Recommendation Granting Defendant United States of America’s Petition for
Determination of Good Faith Settlement” are adopted as the opinion and order of
this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 3, 2017 at Honolulu, Hawai‘i.
ROSENDA SAMUEL, Individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of RIENDA
SUPU; and LEWIS SAMUEL v. USA; CIVIL NO. 15-00141 DKW-KJM;
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?