Ansagay v. Dow Agrosciences LLC
ORDER ADOPTING ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REMAND re 30 - Signed by JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 12 /21/2015. (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
NENA ANSAGAY, on behalf of
herself, THE ESTATE OF
BENJAMIN O. K. ANSAGAY, and
their minor child, K.A. ,
DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC; DOE )
CORPORATION 1; DOES 2-100,
CV 15-00184 SOM-RLP
ORDER ADOPTING ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties
on December 03, 2015, and no objections having been filed by any party,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28,
United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the "Order
Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff’s Motion to File First Amended
Complaint and Findings and Recommendation to Deny Plaintiff’s Motion for
Remand" are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii; December 21, 2015.
/s/ Susan Oki Mollway
Susan Oki Mollway
United States District Judge
Nena Ansagay v. Dow Agrosciences LLD, Civil No. 15-00184 SOM-RLP
Order Adopting Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff’s Motion to
File First Amended Complaint and Findings and Recommendation to Deny
Plaintiff’s Motion for Remand
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?