Civil Beat Law Center for the Public Interest, Inc. v. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention

Filing 53

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION, ECF NO. 52 . Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 2/16/2017. (afc) Order adopts the "Findings and Recommendation to Grant in Part and Deny in Part Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's Fees and Costs"CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII CIVIL BEAT LAW CENTER FOR THE PUBLIC INTEREST, INC., ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) CENTERS FOR DISEASE ) CONTROL AND PREVENTION, ) ) Defendant. ) _____________________________ ) Civ. No. 16-00008 JMS-KSC ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION, ECF NO. 52 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION, ECF NO. 52 Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties on January 31, 2017, and no objections having been filed by any party, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the “FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART /// /// /// /// /// PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS,” ECF No. 52, are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, February 16, 2017. /s/ J. Michael Seabright J. Michael Seabright Chief United States District Judge Civil Beat Law Ctr. for the Pub. Interest, Inc. v. Ctrs. for Disease Control and Prevention, Civ. No. 16-00008 JMS-KSC, Order Adopting Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation, ECF No. 52 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?