Windnagle v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Filing
22
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION re: 21 . Signed by CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 9/22/2016. (afc)ORDER ADOPTS the "Findings and Recommendation to Grant Pla intiffs Christopher Windnagle and Deanna Windnagle's Motion to Decline Jurisdiction and and Remand Proceedings" CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
CHRISTOPHER WINDNAGLE
AND DEANNA WINDNAGLE ,
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
STATE FARM MUTUAL
)
AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE
)
COMPANY; JERMAR PASCUAL; )
AND DOE DEFENDANTS 1-100
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
_____________________________ )
Civ. No. 16-00218 JMS-KJM
ORDER ADOPTING
MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
Findings and Recommendation having been filed on August 31, 2016 and
served on all parties on September 1, 2016, and no objections having been filed by
any party,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28,
United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the “Findings and
Recommendation to Grant Plaintiffs Christopher Windnagle and Deanna
///
///
///
Windnagle’s Motion to Decline Jurisdiction and Remand Proceedings” are
adopted as the opinion and order of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, September 22, 2016.
/s/ J. Michael Seabright
J. Michael Seabright
Chief United States District Judge
Windnagle, et al. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., et al., Civ. No. 16-000218 JMS-KJM, Order
Adopting Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?