True Value Company v. Hills

Filing 32

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION re 31 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 12/12/2016. "The December 12, 2016 deadline for Plaintiff to submit a declaration in support of it s request for an award of attorneys' fees, however, is extended to January 3, 2017." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). John Hills served by first class mail at the address of record on December 12, 2016.

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII TRUE VALUE COMPANY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) JOHN HILLS, ) ) Defendant. ) _____________________________ ) Civ. No. 16-00237 JMS-RLP ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served upon all parties on November 16, 2016, and no objections having been filed by any party, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT PLAINTIFF TRUE VALUE COMPANY’S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT JOHN HILLS AND FOR ORDER OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND TRANSFER OF INFRINGING DOMAIN NAME,” ECF No. 31, are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. The December 12, 2016 /// /// deadline for Plaintiff to submit a declaration in support of its request for an award of attorneys’ fees, however, is extended to January 3, 2017. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, December 12, 2016. /s/ J. Michael Seabright J. Michael Seabright Chief United States District Judge True Value Co. v. Hills, Civ. No. 16-00237 JMS-RLP, Order Adopting Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?