True Value Company v. Hills
Filing
32
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION re 31 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 12/12/2016. "The December 12, 2016 deadline for Plaintiff to submit a declaration in support of it s request for an award of attorneys' fees, however, is extended to January 3, 2017." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). John Hills served by first class mail at the address of record on December 12, 2016.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
TRUE VALUE COMPANY,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
JOHN HILLS,
)
)
Defendant.
)
_____________________________ )
Civ. No. 16-00237 JMS-RLP
ORDER ADOPTING
MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served upon all
parties on November 16, 2016, and no objections having been filed by any party,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title
28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT PLAINTIFF TRUE VALUE
COMPANY’S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST
DEFENDANT JOHN HILLS AND FOR ORDER OF PERMANENT
INJUNCTION AND TRANSFER OF INFRINGING DOMAIN NAME,” ECF No.
31, are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. The December 12, 2016
///
///
deadline for Plaintiff to submit a declaration in support of its request for an award
of attorneys’ fees, however, is extended to January 3, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, December 12, 2016.
/s/ J. Michael Seabright
J. Michael Seabright
Chief United States District Judge
True Value Co. v. Hills, Civ. No. 16-00237 JMS-RLP, Order Adopting Magistrate Judge’s
Findings and Recommendation
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?