Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Cortez et al
Filing
23
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION re 21 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 11/2/2016. (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Donnie R. Cortez served by first class mail at the address of record on November 3, 2016.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
AS TRUSTEE FOR THE OPTION
ONE MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST
2007-2, ASSET-BACKED
CERTIFICATES, SERIES
2007-2,
Plaintiff,
vs.
DONNIE R. CORTEZ;
ANNABELLE S. CORTEZ;
DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION,
STATE OF HAWAII; CREDIT
ASSOCIATES OF MAUI, LTD.;
JOHN DOES 1-20; JANE DOES
1-20; DOE CORPORATIONS 120; DOE ENTITIES 1-20;
AND DOE GOVERNMENTAL
UNITS 1-20,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIV. NO. 16-00349 JMS-KSC
ORDER ADOPTING
MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
Findings and Recommendation having been filed on October 14, 2016 and
served concurrently upon those counsel of record who are registered participants
of CM/ECF, and served on October 17, 2016 by First Class Mail to the address of
record for Donnie R. Cortez, and no objections having been filed by any party,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28,
United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the “FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
REMAND,” ECF No. 21, are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, November 2, 2016.
/s/ J. Michael Seabright
J. Michael Seabright
Chief United States District Judge
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Cortez, et al., Civ. No. 16-00349 JMS-KSC, Order Adopting
Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?