Holbrook v. State of Hawaii, Department of Taxation
Filing
12
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION, AS MODIFIED (ECF NO. 11 ) - Signed by JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on 9/19/2016. (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to recei ve electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Lawrence J. Holbrook shall be served by first class mail at the address of record on September 20, 2016.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
LAWRENCE J. HOLBROOK,
Plaintiff,
vs.
STATE OF HAWAII, DEPARTMENT
OF TAXATION,
Defendant.
____________________________
_
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL NO. 16-00422 HG-RLP
ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION, AS MODIFIED (ECF NO. 11)
Findings and Recommendation having been filed on August
9, 2016 and served on all parties on August 10, 2016, and no
objections having been filed by any party,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that,
pursuant to
Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local
Rule 74.2, the “Findings and Recommendation to Deny
Plaintiff’s Request for Appointment of Counsel” (ECF. No. 11),
are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court with the
following modifications:
On page 1, paragraph 1, line 3, replace “ECF No. 3, 9, 10"
with “ECF Nos. 3, 10”.
On page 4, paragraph 1, line 4, replace “Id. at 4” with “ECF
No. 3 at 4.”
1
On page 5, paragraph 1, line 3, replace “1977)” with “1977))”.
On Page 6, numbered paragraph 2, line 1, replace “tat” with
“that”.
On page 7, paragraph 2, line 13, replace “Id.” with “Id. at
*2.”
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 19, 2016, Honolulu, Hawaii.
_________________________________
__
Helen Gillmor
United States District Judge
Lawrence J. Holbrook v. State of Hawaii, Department of
Taxation, 16cv422HG-RLP, ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION, AS MODIFIED (ECF NO. 11)
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?