Holbrook v. State of Hawaii, Department of Taxation

Filing 12

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION, AS MODIFIED (ECF NO. 11 ) - Signed by JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on 9/19/2016. (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to recei ve electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Lawrence J. Holbrook shall be served by first class mail at the address of record on September 20, 2016.

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII LAWRENCE J. HOLBROOK, Plaintiff, vs. STATE OF HAWAII, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION, Defendant. ____________________________ _ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL NO. 16-00422 HG-RLP ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION, AS MODIFIED (ECF NO. 11) Findings and Recommendation having been filed on August 9, 2016 and served on all parties on August 10, 2016, and no objections having been filed by any party, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the “Findings and Recommendation to Deny Plaintiff’s Request for Appointment of Counsel” (ECF. No. 11), are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court with the following modifications: On page 1, paragraph 1, line 3, replace “ECF No. 3, 9, 10" with “ECF Nos. 3, 10”. On page 4, paragraph 1, line 4, replace “Id. at 4” with “ECF No. 3 at 4.” 1 On page 5, paragraph 1, line 3, replace “1977)” with “1977))”. On Page 6, numbered paragraph 2, line 1, replace “tat” with “that”. On page 7, paragraph 2, line 13, replace “Id.” with “Id. at *2.” IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 19, 2016, Honolulu, Hawaii. _________________________________ __ Helen Gillmor United States District Judge Lawrence J. Holbrook v. State of Hawaii, Department of Taxation, 16cv422HG-RLP, ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION, AS MODIFIED (ECF NO. 11) 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?