Sommers v. Okamoto et al
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION re 20 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 1/27/2017. (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Maria D. Sommers served by first class mail at the address of record on January 27, 2017.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
MARIA D. SOMMERS,
KAY OKAMOTO; ROY
Civ. No. 16-00558 JMS-KJM
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
Findings and Recommendation having been filed on January 5, 2017, and
served concurrently upon those counsel of record who are registered participants
of CM/ECF, and served on January 6, 2017, by First Class Mail to the address of
record for Maria D. Sommers, and no objections having been filed by any party,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28,
United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the
“(1) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY DEFENDANTS KAY
OKAMOTO, ROY OKAMOTO, AND OKAMOTO REALTY’S MOTION TO
DISMISS, AND (2) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF MARIA D. SOMMERS’S
MOTION TO ENTER DEFAULT JUDGMENT,” ECF No. 20, the Findings and
Recommendations are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court with the
following modification. On January 26, 2017, counsel for Defendants accepted
service on behalf of all Defendants as of that date. See ECF No. 25. Accordingly,
the court declines to adopt the recommendation that this court “provide Plaintiff
with an additional 30 days from the issuance of its order to properly serve
Defendants,” as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, January 27, 2017.
/s/ J. Michael Seabright
J. Michael Seabright
Chief United States District Judge
Sommers v. Okamoto, et al., Civ. No. 16-00558 JMS-KJM, Order Adopting Magistrate Judge’s
Findings and Recommendation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?