State of Hawaii v. Trump

Filing 117

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. 111 112 . Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE KEVIN S.C. CHANG on 3/10/2017. [Pro Hac Vice as to Mary Ellen Simonson and Natasha J. Baker ] (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII STATE OF HAWAII; ISMAIL ELSHIKH, Plaintiffs, vs. DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; JOHN F. KELLY, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE; REX TILLERSON, in his official capacity as Secretary of State; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants. ______________________________ ) CIVIL NO. 17-00050 DKW-KSC ) ) ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO ) APPEAR PRO HAC VICE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE On March 10, 2017, Mary Ellen Simonson and Natasha J. Baker filed Motions to Appear Pro Hac Vice. & 112. Doc. Nos. 111 The Court finds that the Motions satisfy the requirements set forth in Rule 83.1(e) of the Local Rules of Practice for the U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the Motions and will permit Ms. Simonson and Ms. Baker to appear before this Court in this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, March 10, 2017. _____________________________ Kevin S.C. Chang United States Magistrate Judge CIVIL NO. 17-00050 DKW-KSC; STATE, ET AL. V. TRUMP, ET AL.; ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?