State of Hawaii v. Trump

Filing 157

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MICHAEL B. KEATING'S MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE 149 . Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE KEVIN S.C. CHANG on 3/13/2017. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Michael Keating to be notified thru local counsel of record Brett Tobin

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII STATE OF HAWAII; ISMAIL ELSHIKH, Plaintiffs, vs. DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; JOHN F. KELLY, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE; REX TILLERSON, in his official capacity as Secretary of State; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants. ______________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL NO. 17-00050 DKW-KSC ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MICHAEL B. KEATING’S MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MICHAEL B. KEATING’S MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE On March 13, 2017, the Michael B. Keating filed a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Doc. No. 149. The Court finds that the Motion is incomplete, as Mr. Keating failed to provide an answer to paragraph 7 of his declaration, which asks that counsel identify the courts in which he or she is a registered CM/ECF user.1 Accordingly, the Court DENIES the Motion without prejudice. 1 Mr. Keating otherwise satisfies the requirements set forth in Local Rule 83.1(e). IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, March 13, 2017. _____________________________ Kevin S.C. Chang United States Magistrate Judge CIVIL NO. 17-00050 DKW-KSC; STATE, ET AL. V. TRUMP, ET AL.; ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MICHAEL B. KEATING’S MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?