State of Hawaii v. Trump
ORDER of USCA as to #271 Notice of Appeal, filed by U.S. Department of State, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Rex Tillerson, John F. Kelly, United States of America, Donald J. Trump, 9CCA NO. 17-15589: "... initial en banc proceedings are concluded, and all remaining issues will be decided by the three-judge panel." "This case is scheduled for oral argument before the three-judge panel at 9:30 a.m. on Monday, May 15, 2017, in Seattle Washington." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParties served by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
APR 21 2017
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S . COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STATE OF HAWAII; ISMAIL
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official
capacity as President of the United
States; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF
HOMELAND SECURITY; JOHN F.
KELLY, in his official capacity as
Secretary of Homeland Security; U.S.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE; REX W.
TILLERSON, in his official capacity as
Secretary of State; UNITED STATES
District of Hawaii,
THOMAS, Chief Judge and En Banc Coordinator:
The full court was advised of the petition for initial hearing en bane. A
judge requested a vote on whether to hear the matter en bane before the limited en
bane court. Another judge requested a vote on whether to hear the matter en bane
before the full court. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the
nonrecused active judges in favor of initial en bane consideration. Fed. R. App. P.
Case: 17- 15589, 04/21/20 17, ID: 10406467, DktEntry: 184, Page 1 of2
35. Therefore, initial en bane proceedings are concluded, and all remaining issues
will be decided by the three-judge panel. The denial of the request for initial
hearing en bane does not preclude any party from filing a petition for rehearing en
bane pursuant to the applicable rules following issuance of the panel opinion.
This case is scheduled for oral argument before the three-judge panel at 9:30
a.m. on Monday, May 15, 2017, in Seattle Washington.
Case: 17-15589, 04/21/20 17, ID: 10406467, DktEntry: 184, Page 2 of2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?