State of Hawaii v. Trump

Filing 362

ORDER of USCA as to 346 Notice of Appeal, filed by U.S. Department of State, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Rex Tillerson, John F. Kelly, United States of America, Donald J. Trump, 9CCA NO. 17-16426: "In light of the Supreme Court's September 12, 2017 order, the mandate in this case is stayed with regards to the portions of opinion that address refugees covered by formal assurances pending further action of the Court. The modified injunction requiring the Government to allow grandparents, grandchildren, brothers-in-law, sisters-in-law, aunts, uncles, nieces, nephews, and cousins of persons in the United States, however, remains in effect as it has never been stayed and is not stayed by the Supreme Court's September 12, 2017 order." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParties served by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Download PDF
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED SEP 14 2017 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF HAWAII and ISMAIL ELSHIKH, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; et al., No. 17-16426 D.C. No. 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC District of Hawaii, Honolulu ORDER Defendants-Appellants. Before: HAWKINS, GOULD, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges. In light of the Supreme Court’s September 12, 2017 order, the mandate in this case is stayed with regards to the portions of opinion that address refugees covered by formal assurances pending further action of the Court. The modified injunction requiring the Government to allow grandparents, grandchildren, brothers-in-law, sisters-in-law, aunts, uncles, nieces, nephews, and cousins of persons in the United States, however, remains in effect as it has never been stayed and is not stayed by the Supreme Court’s September 12, 2017 order. Case: 17-16426, 09/14/2017, ID: 10581376, DktEntry: 76, Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?