State of Hawaii v. Trump

Filing 399

ORDER of USCA (On Remand from the United States Supreme Court) as to #271 Notice of Appeal, filed by U.S. Department of State, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Rex Tillerson, John F. Kelly, United States of America, Donald J. Trump, 9CCA NO. 17-15589: "In view of the Supreme Court order dated October 24, 2017, the court's opinion filed June 12, 2017, is vacated and the appeal is dismissed as moot. The case is remanded to the district court with directions to dismiss as moot the challenge to Executive Order No. 13,780. The filing of this order shall serve as the court's mandate." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParties served by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Download PDF
FILED FOR PUBLICATION NOV 2 2017 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STATE OF HAWAII; ISMAIL ELSHIKH, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; JOHN F. KELLY, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE; REX W. TILLERSON, in his official capacity as Secretary of State; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. U.S. COURT OF APPEALS 17-15589 D.C. No. 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC District of Hawaii, Honolulu ORDER Defendants-Appellants. On Remand From The United States Supreme Court Before: Michael Daly Hawkins, Ronald M. Gould, and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges. In view of the Supreme Court order dated October 24, 2017, the court's opinion filed June 12, 2017, is vacated and the appeal is dismissed as moot. The case is remanded to the district court with directions to dismiss as moot the challenge to Executive Order No. 13,780. The filing of this order shall serve as the court's mandate. Case: 17-15589, 11/02/2017, ID: 10642054, DktEntry: 325, Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?