Tower et al v. United States of America et al
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION re: 16 . Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 10/4/2017. (afc) Order adopts the "FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY THE PETITION TO QUASH 3 RD PARTY SUMMONS AND TO GRANT THE UNITED STATES' MOTION FOR SUMMARY DENIAL OF THE PETITION TO QUASH AND FOR ENFORCEMENT OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE SUMMONS"CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to r eceive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
LOUISE TOWER AND SHAWN
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL )
REVENUE, and BLANCHE
GALASINAO, REVENUE AGENT, )
CIV. NO. 17-00226 JMS-RLP
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties
on August 29, 2017, and no objections having been filed by any party,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28,
United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the “FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY THE PETITION TO QUASH 3RD
PARTY SUMMONS AND TO GRANT THE UNITED STATES’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY DENIAL OF THE PETITION TO QUASH AND FOR
ENFORCEMENT OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE SUMMONS,” ECF No.
16, are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, October 4, 2017.
/s/ J. Michael Seabright
J. Michael Seabright
Chief United States District Judge
Tower, et al. v. United States, et al., Civ. No. 17-00226 JMS-RLP, Order Adopting Magistrate
Judge’s Findings and Recommendation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?