Schuyler v. Berryhill
Filing
39
ORDER REMANDING CASE TO ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE - Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 10/6/2020. There being no further issues for this Court to decide, the case is HEREBY REMANDED to the ALJ to conduct further proc eedings consistent with the Ninth Circuit's memorandum disposition. The Clerk's Office is DIRECTED to effectuate the remand on October 21, 2020, unless a timely motion for reconsideration of this Order is filed. (emt, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF HAWAII
SEAN PHILIP SCHUYLER,
CIV. NO. 17-00277 LEK-RT
Plaintiff,
vs.
ANDREW M. SAUL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security;
Defendants.
ORDER REMANDING CASE TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
On September 21, 2018, this Court filed its Order
Granting Plaintiff’s Appeal and Reversing the Administrative Law
Judge’s October 15, 2015 Decision, and the Judgment in a Civil
Case (“Judgment”) was issued.
[Dkt. nos. 21, 22.]
After the
Commissioner’s post-judgment motion was denied, [dkt. nos. 23
(motion), 29 (order denying motion),] the Commissioner filed a
Notice of Appeal, [dkt. no. 30].1
On July 24, 2020, the Ninth Circuit issued a
memorandum disposition, affirming the Judgment in part and
reversing it in part.
[Dkt. no. 36.]
The Ninth Circuit
affirmed this Court’s rulings that that the Administrative Law
Judge (“ALJ”) erred in rejecting Plaintiff Sean Philip
1
During the proceedings before this Court, Nancy A.
Berryhill was the Acting Commissioner of Social Security.
Andrew M. Saul is now the Commissioner of Social Security.
Schuyler’s (“Plaintiff”) testimony without stating sufficient
reasons, and that the ALJ’s error was not harmless.
3.]
[Id. at 2-
However, the Ninth Circuit reversed this Court’s rulings
that the ALJ failed to provide germane reasons to reject lay
evidence, and that the record supported remand to the ALJ for
the determination and award of benefits.
[Id. at 3-4.]
The
Ninth Circuit remanded the case to this Court, with instructions
“to remand to the ALJ so the ALJ may resolve th[e] factual
dispute [regarding whether Plaintiff could perform regular work]
and reconsider its residual functional capacity finding in light
of [Plaintiff]’s testimony that he needs one day off per week.”
[Id. at 4.]
There being no further issues for this Court to
decide, the case is HEREBY REMANDED to the ALJ to conduct
further proceedings consistent with the Ninth Circuit’s
memorandum disposition.
The Clerk’s Office is DIRECTED to
effectuate the remand on October 21, 2020, unless a timely
motion for reconsideration of this Order is filed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
DATED AT HONOLULU, HAWAII, October 6, 2020.
SEAN PHILIP SCHUYLER VS. ANDREW M. SAUL; CV 17-00277 LEK-RT;
ORDER REMANDING CASE TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?