The Bank of New York Mellon v. Perry et al
Filing
33
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION re 28 - Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 10/20/2017. (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notif ications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Len C. Perry, Jr. and Nathan Jon Lewis shall be served by first class mail to the addresses of record on October 23, 2017.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
THE BANK OF NEW YORK
MELLON fka THE BANK OF NEW
YORK, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE
CERTIFICATE HOLDERS OF
CWMBS INC.; CHL MORTGAGE
PASS-THROUGH TRUST 2006OA5, MORTGAGE PASS
THROUGH CERTIFICATES,
SERIES 2006-OA5, a Delaware
corporation,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff(s),
)
)
vs.
)
)
LEN C. PERRY, JR.; NATHAN
)
JON LEWIS; 3925
)
KAMEHAMEHA RD
)
PRINCEVILLE, HI 96722, LLC
)
)
Defendant(s).
)
_____________________________ )
CV 17-00297 DKW-RLP
ORDER ADOPTING
MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
Findings and Recommendation having been filed on October 2, 2017 and
served on all parties on October 03, 2017, and no objections having been filed by
any party,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28,
United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the "Findings and
Recommendations to Grant Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Answer of Defendants Len
C. Perry and 3925 Kamemeha Rd Princeville, HI 96722, LLC" are adopted as the
opinion and order of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: October 20, 2017 at Honolulu, Hawai’i.
/s/ Derrick K. Watson
Derrick K. Watson
United States District Judge
The Bank of New York Mellon et al v Len C. Perry, et al; Civil No. 17-00297 DKW
RLP; ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?