The Bank of New York Mellon v. Perry et al
Filing
46
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION re 43 - Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 12/20/2017. (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electroni c notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Len C. Perry, Jr. and Nathan Jon Lewis served by first class mail to the addresses of record on December 20, 2017.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
THE BANK OF NEW YORK
MELLON fka THE BANK OF NEW
YORK, as Trustee for the Certificate
Holders of the CWMBS Inc., CHL
Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2006OA5, Mortgage Pass Through
Certificates, Series 2006-OA5, a
Delaware corporation ,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff(s),
)
)
vs.
)
)
LEN C. PERRY JR.; NATHAN JON )
LEWIS; 3925 KAMEHAMEHA RD )
PRINCEVILLE, HI 96722, LLC ,
)
)
Defendant(s).
)
_____________________________ )
CV 17-00297 DKW-RLP
ORDER ADOPTING
MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
Findings and Recommendation having been filed on November 29, 2017
and served on all parties on November 30, 2017, and no objections having been
filed by any party,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28,
United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the "Findings and
Recommendations to Grant Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike “Answer to Complaint
Affidavit; Affidavit of Negative Averment” of Defendant Len C. Perry" are
adopted as the opinion and order of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: December 20, 2017 at Honolulu, Hawai’i.
/s/ Derrick K. Watson
Derrick K. Watson
United States District Judge
The Bank of New York Mellon v. Len C. Perry, Jr., et al.; Civil No. 17-00297
DKW-RLP; ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?