Hawaii Masons' Pension Trust Fund v. Stonemasters, Inc., a Hawaii corporation

Filing 20

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION re 19 Findings and Recommendation To Grant Plaintiffs' Motion For Default Judgment Against Defendant Stonemasters, Inc.. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 04/18/2018. (eps, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII HAWAII MASONS' PENSION TRUST FUND; HAWAII MASONS’ AND PLASTERERS’ ANNUITY TRUST FUND; HAWAII MASONS’ VACATION AND HOLIDAY TRUST FUND; HAWAII MASONS’ AND PLASTERERS’ APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING TRUST FUND; HAWAII MASONS’ HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) STONEMASTERS INC., a Hawaii ) corporation; MICAH WATTS, ) individually; AMORA WATTS, ) individually; TIANA SPENCER, ) individually; JOHN DOES 1-10; ) JANE DOES 1-10; DOE ) CORPORATIONS 1-10; DOE ) PARTNERSHIPS 1-10; DOE ) GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES 1- ) 10, DOE TRUSTS 1-10, ) ) Defendants. ) _____________________________ ) CIV NO. 17-00395 LEK-KSC ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Findings and Recommendation having been filed on March 16, 2018 and served on March 16, 2018 to participants registered to receive electronic notifications and on March 19, 2018 by first class mail to participants not registered to receive electronic notifications, and no objections having been filed by any party, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the "Findings and Recommendation To Grant Plaintiffs' Motion For Default Judgment Against Defendant Stonemasters, Inc. ", ECF NO. [19] are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED AT HONOLULU, HAWAII, April 18, 2018. /s/ Leslie E. Kobayashi Leslie E. Kobayashi United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?