Alefosio v. The Hawaii Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) Office et al

Filing 45

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S AMENDED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY WITHOUT PREJUDICE ECF NO. 24 MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND ECF NO. 31 REQUEST FOR THE COURT CLERK TO ENTER DEFAULT JUDGMENT re 28 , 40 - Signed by JUDGE J . MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 1/29/2025. COURT'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Leauma Ben Alefosio shall be served by First Class Mail to the address of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) on 1/29/2025. Pro Se (Non-Prisoner) Litigants that have consented to receive documents and Notices of Electronic Filings by email, have been served electronically at the e-mail address listed on the (NEF). (jni)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII LEAUMA BEN ALEFOSIO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) THE HAWAII EQUAL ) EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ) COMMISSION (EEOC) OFFICE; ) THE AMERICAN SAMOA ) GOVERNMENT, ) ) Defendants. ) _____________________________ ) CV 24-00329 JMS-RT ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S AMENDED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY WITHOUT PREJUDICE ECF NO. [24] MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND ECF NO. [31] REQUEST FOR THE COURT CLERK TO ENTER DEFAULT JUDGMENT ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S AMENDED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY WITHOUT PREJUDICE ECF NO. [24] MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND ECF NO. [31] REQUEST FOR THE COURT CLERK TO ENTER DEFAULT JUDGMENT Amended Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties on January 14, 2025, and no objections having been filed by any party, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.1, the Findings and Recommendations are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ J. Michael Seabright J. Michael Seabright United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?