Fleming v. Escort Inc. et al

Filing 86

ORDER re 85 Memorandum Decision and Order. It is hereby ordered that the Passport iQ is added to this case on the understanding that it will raise no new infringement contentions. The parties are directed to conduct discovery assuming that the Passport iQ is part of this case. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by cjm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO HOYT A. FLEMING, Plaintiff, v. ESCORT, INC. and BELTRONICS USA, INC., Defendants. Case No. CV 09-105-S-BLW ORDER The Court issued an order (docket no. 85) directing plaintiff to determine if the Passport iQ added new infringement contentions to the case. Plaintiff has now informed the Court that adding the Passport iQ will not add any new infringement contentions to the case. Accordingly, NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Passport iQ is added to this case on the understanding that it will raise no new infringement contentions. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the parties are directed to conduct discovery assuming that the Passport iQ is part of this case. DATED: November 12, 2010 B. LYNN WINMILL Chief Judge United States District Court Order - 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?