Goodwin et al v. Beckley et al
Filing
42
MEMORANDUM DECISION and Order re: 38 Order on Motion for Attorney Fees, Order on Motion for Taxation of Costs, (The Court amends its award of fees from $20,558.01 to the amount of $23,708.01, The Court prior award of $408.20 in taxable costs and $1,005.97 in non-taxable costs remains unchanged.) Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by krb)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO
DALE GOOD WIN, an individual, JOHN LINDBERGH and NANCY LINDBERGH, husband and wife; DAVID COOKSEY and JILL COOKSEY, husband and wife; ANN WALCH, an individual; and JOHN DOES 1-15, Plaintiffs, v. WAYNE BECKLY, an individual; PAUL BECKLEY, an individual; BALD MOUNTAIN LP, a California limited partnership, Defendants.
Case No. 1:09-CV-594-BLW MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
On October 12, 2010, the Court issued a Memorandum Decision and Order (Dkt. 38) regarding Plaintiffs' motions for attorney fees (Dkt. 33) and taxation of costs (Dkt. 34). On page three of that Memorandum Decision and Order, the Court reduced Plaintiffs' requested attorney fees by $3,500, which sum was incorrectly calculated. Any reference to the sum of $3,500 in this Court's prior Memorandum Decision and Order (Dkt. 38) should be amended to $350.00 based on the calculation of 3.5 hours of clerical/secretarial time at the rate of $100 per hour. The Court's award of taxable and
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - 1
nontaxable costs remains unchanged. ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED: 1. $23,708.01. 2. The Court prior award of $408.20 in taxable costs and $1,005.97 in The Court amends its award of fees from $20,558.01 to the amount of
non-taxable costs remains unchanged.
DATED: November 29, 2010
B. LYNN WINMILL Chief Judge U.S. District Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?