Findlay v. Economy Premier Assurance Company

Filing 18

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 14 Motion for Arbitration. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by cjm)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO JAMES FINDLAY, Case No. 1:11-cv-00434-BLW Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ECONOMY PREMIER ASSURANCE COMPANY, a Rhode Island corporation; DOES I-V, unknown parties, Defendant. Before the Court is a motion to stay and compel arbitration filed by Plaintiff James Findlay. (Dkt. 14). Findlay moves to stay the litigation and compel arbitration because he “desires to protect his contractual and statutory rights under Idaho law.” Pl.’s Br. at 1, Dkt. 14. Defendant Economy Premier Assurance opposes the motion, arguing that the insurance contract requires that both parties consent before the matter can be arbitrated, and Economy Premier does not consent. Economy Premier refers the Court to the arbitration provision contained in the insurance contract, which provides: “Upon written consent of both parties, any disagreement will be settled by arbitration.” Auto Insurance Policy at 12, Ex. A to Schroeder Aff., 15-1. Given this clear and unambiguous language requiring both parties’ MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - 1 consent and Economy Premier’s representation that it does not consent, the Court must deny Findlay’s motion to stay litigation and compel arbitration. ORDER IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Demand for Arbitration (Dkt. 14) is DENIED. DATED: February 9, 2012 _________________________ B. Lynn Winmill Chief Judge United States District Court MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?