Gerlock v. Bank of America Idaho, N.A. et al
Filing
31
JUDGMENT is entered in favor of the Defendants and the claims in Plaintiff's Verified Complaint against Defendants are DISMISSED, with prejudice. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO
SHANNON M. GERLOCK, and the REAL
PROPERTY located in Canyon County, State
of Idaho, Lot 2 in Block 1 of Rambling
Subdivision, According to the Official Plat
Thereof, Filed in Book 9 of Plats at Page 22,
Records of Said County,
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00532-BLW-REB
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE
Plaintiff,
vs.
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., BANK OF
AMERICA HOME LOANS SERVICING,
L.P.; RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A.,
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE
ASSOCIATION, MORTGAGE
ELECTRONIC RECORDING SYSTEMS,
INC. and UNKNOWN ENTITIES and
INDIVIDUALS JOHN and/or JANE DOES,
I-X,
Defendants.
Plaintiff Shannon Gerlock (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Bank of America, N.A.
(“BANA”), for itself and as successor by merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP fka
Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP (erroneously sued as “Bank of America Home Loans
Servicing, LP”), ReconTrust Company, N.A. (“ReconTrust”), Federal National Mortgage
Association (“FNMA”), and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (erroneously sued
as “Mortgage Electronic Recording Systems, Inc.”) (“MERS”) (collectively, “Defendants”) have
reached settlement of the instant lawsuit and stipulated to dismiss the lawsuit with prejudice.
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE- 1
IT IS THEREFORE HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:
1.
Judgment is entered in favor of the Defendants and the claims in Plaintiff’s
Verified Complaint (“Complaint”) against Defendants are DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE.
DATED: August 29, 2012
_________________________
B. Lynn Winmill
Chief Judge
United States District Court
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE- 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?