DeRock v. Sprint-Nextel

Filing 15

ORDER in case 1:11-cv-00619-BLW-LMB; in case 1:12-cv-00024-BLW-LMB; in case 1:12-cv-00168-BLW-LMB; in case 1:12-cv-00339-BLW-LMB; ORDER in case 1:12-cv-00316-BLW-LMB; in case 1:12-cv-00305-BLW-LMB; in case 1:12-cv-00301-BLW-LMB; in case 1:12-cv-00177 -BLW-LMB; in case 1:12-cv-00176-BLW-LMB; in case 1:12-cv-00169-BLW-LMB; denying (5) Motion for Cell Phone Record; finding as moot (6) Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; finding as moot (9) Motion to Appoint Counsel ; finding as moot (11 ) Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; adopting (13) Report and Recommendations.; finding as moot (1) Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis in case 1:11-cv-00619-BLW-LMB; finding as moot (6) Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; finding as moot (9) Motion to Appoint Counsel ; finding as moot (11) Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; finding as moot (1) Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis in case 1:12-cv-00024-BLW-LMB; finding as moot (5) Mot ion ; finding as moot (6) Motion to Appoint Counsel ; finding as moot (10) Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; finding as moot (1) Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis in case 1:12-cv-00168-BLW-LMB; finding as moot (5) Motion to Appoint Counsel ; finding as moot (9) Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; finding as moot (1) Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis in case 1:12-cv-00169-BLW-LMB; finding as moot (4) Motion ; finding as moot (9) Motion for L eave to Proceed in forma pauperis; finding as moot (1) Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; finding as moot (3) Motion to Appoint Counsel in case 1:12-cv-00176-BLW-LMB; finding as moot (8) Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; f inding as moot (1) Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis in case 1:12-cv-00177-BLW-LMB; finding as moot (10) Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; finding as moot (1) Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; finding as moot (3) Motion to Appoint Counsel in case 1:12-cv-00301-BLW-LMB; finding as moot (9) Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; finding as moot (1) Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; finding as moot (3) Motion to Appoint Counsel in ca se 1:12-cv-00305-BLW-LMB; finding as moot (6) Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; finding as moot (7) Motion to Appoint Counsel ; finding as moot (1) Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; finding as moot (3) Motion for Recusal . in case 1:12-cv-00316-BLW-LMB; finding as moot (1) Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; finding as moot (3) Motion to Appoint Counsel in case 1:12-cv-00339-BLW-LMB in case 1:12-cv-00168-BLW-LMB. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that DeRock is r equired to obtain approval of the court before filing any further complaints; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Clerk shall close each of the above-listed cases. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. Associated Cases: 1:11-cv-00619-BLW-LMB et al.(caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO

RODRICK G. DeROCK,
Case No. 1:11-cv-00619-BLW-LMB
(Lead Case)

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

SPRINT-NEXTEL,
Defendant.

RODRICK G. DeROCK,
Case No. 1:12-cv-00024-BLW-LMB

Plaintiff,
v.
BOISE CITY, and ADA COUNTY
HOUSING AUTHORITY,
Defendants.

RODRICK G. DeROCK,
Case No. 1:12-cv-00168-BLW-LMB

Plaintiff,
v.
BOISE CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE,
and BOISE POLICE DEPARTMENT,
Defendants.

RODRICK G. DeROCK,
Case No. 1:12-cv-00169-BLW-LMB
Plaintiff,
v.
HOUSING AND URBAN
DEVELOPMENT,
Defendant.

RODRICK G. DeROCK,
Case No. 1:12-cv-00176-BLW-LMB

Plaintiff,
v.
BOISE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT,
Defendant.

RODRICK G. DeROCK,
Case No. 1:12-cv-00177-BLW-LMB

Plaintiff,
v.
P. GLORIA DeKELLEY,
Defendant.

RODRICK G. DeROCK,
Plaintiff,

Case No. 1:12-cv-00301-BLW-LMB
v.

LEGAL AID,
Defendant.

RODRICK G. DeROCK,
Case No. 1:12-cv-00305-BLW-LMB

Plaintiff,
v.
INTERMOUNTAIN FAIR HOUSING
COUNCIL,
Defendant.

RODRICK G. DeROCK,
No. 1:12-cv-00316-BLW-LMB

Plaintiff,
v.
IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
AND WELFARE,
Defendant.

RODRICK G. DeROCK,
No. 1:12-cv-00339-BLW-LMB

Plaintiff,
v.
LIVING INDEPENDENCE NETWORK
CORPORATION,
Defendant.

INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Rodrick DeRock has the filed the above captioned lawsuits in relation to an
ongoing dispute DeRock has regarding a $64 increase in rent at his place of residence. In
summary, DeRock claims that the various defendants in each action has played some part in
conspiring to have DeRock evicted or unlawfully pay more rent.

Each of the complaints was conditionally filed based on DeRock’s request for in forma
pauperis status. Because the complaints all related to the same subject matter, the Court ordered
that they be consolidated and referred to Magistrate Judge Larry M. Boyle for an initial review
under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Judge Boyle issued his Report and Recommendation (R&R) and
DeRock filed an objection thereto. The matter is now at issue.
ANALYSIS
The Court finds that the R&R accurately sets forth the facts and correctly analyzes the
law. After a thorough discussion, reviewing the claims against each defendant in depth, the
R&R recommends that each of DeRock’s complaints be dismissed. DeRock’s objection contains
nothing that would alter the recommendations reached in the R&R. Accordingly, the Court will
adopt the R&R as the decision of the Court.
ORDER
In accordance with the Memorandum Decision set forth above,
NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for cell phone record
(docket no. 5 in CV:11-619) is DENIED;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Report and Recommendation (docket no. 13) is
ADOPTED in full as the decision of this Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that following cases are DISMISSED:
1.

DeRock v. Sprint-Nextel, 1:11-cv-00619-BLW-LMB;

2.

DeRock v. Boise City, et al, 1:12-cv-00024-BLW-LMB;

3.

DeRock v. Boise City Attorney’s Office, et al, 1:12-cv-00168-BLW-LMB;

4.

DeRock v. Hous. and Urban Dev., 1:12-cv-00169-BLW-LMB;

5.

DeRock v. Boise City Police Dept., 1:12-cv-00176-BLW-LMB;

6.

DeRock v. DeKelley, 1:12-cv-00177-BLW-LMB;

7.

DeRock v. Legal Aid, 1:12-cv-00301-BLW-LMB;

8.

DeRock v. Intermountain Fair Hous. Council, 1:12-cv-00305-BLW-LMB;

9.

DeRock v. Idaho Depart. of Health & Welfare, 1:12-cv-00316-BLW-LMB; and

10.

DeRock v. Living Independence Network Corp., 1:12-cv-00339-BLW-LMB.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that DeRock’s requests to proceed in forma pauperis be
DENIED as moot;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the multitude of remaining pending motions in each
case be DENIED as moot;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that DeRock is required to obtain approval of the court
before filing any further complaints; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Clerk shall close each of the above-listed cases.

DATED: September 26, 2012

Honorable B. Lynn Winmill
Chief U. S. District Judge