Hoskins v. Board of Corrections et al

Filing 95

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 47 IDOC Defendants Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6); finding as moot 66 Plaintiffs Motion To Court Clerk To Serve John Burke with Subpoenas for Defendants; noting 68 Plaintiffs Motion To Inform Court That Previous Court Order Denied theDefendants Motion to Dismiss So the Motion for Summary JudgmentShould Be Denied as the Same and Motion for Courts Help; denying 70 Plaintiffs Motion To Request All Electronic Emails To and About Hoskinsfrom Shell Fisher; denying 72 Plaintiffs Request for Production of Documents; denying 74 Plaintiffs Motion to Request This Court To Provide a Pro Bono Attorney for Discovery; striking 76 Plaintiffs Motion to Have Courts Help in Discovery Process; finding as moot 77 Plaintiffs Second Motion To Court Clerk To Serve John Burke with Subpoenas for Defendants; granting 79 Defendants Fishers and Siegerts Motion for Summary Judgment; striking 83 Plaintiffs Motion for Leave of Court To Amend Com plaint and Dismiss Some Defendants and Add New Corizon Defendants; finding as moot 84 Plaintiffs Motion To Compel Corizon John Burke Elam to Provide Requested Addresses of Former Employees; noting 88 Plaintiffs Motion for Denying Defendants Summa ry Judgment; striking 89 Plaintiffs Motion for Court to Order Corizon or IDOC To Have Hoskins See a Specialist; finding as moot 93 Plaintiffs Motion to Reassign Judge B. Lynn Winmill from This Case; striking 94 Plaintiffs Pleading to Attorney G enerals Office to Get All Documents. This entire action is dismissed. All claims against Defendants Smith, Siegert, Fisher, and Whittington are DISMISSED with prejudice. All claims against the remaining Defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)