Bostock v. Aurora Loan Services, LLC et al
Filing
49
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. IT IS ORDERED THAT Safecos Motion to Seal 48 is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to seal the documents filed at Dockets 41-3 and 41-4. Safeco is directed to re-file redacted versions of these documents. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO
BARBARA BOSTOCK,
Case No. 1:14-cv-00329-BLW
Plaintiff,
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND
ORDER
v.
AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLC;
SAFECO INSURANCE CO. OF
ILLINOIS; MORTGAGE
ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION
SYSTEMS, INC.; and JOHN or JANE
DOES 1 THROUGH 10,
Defendants.
Pending before the Court is Defendant Safeco Insurance Co. of Illinois’ Motion to
Seal Docket 41-3 and 41-4 (Dkt. 48). Safeco explains that it inadvertently included some
of plaintiff’s personal information when it filed these documents with the Court. Safeco
therefore asks the Court to seal these documents. Good cause appearing, the Court will
grant the request, but will also direct Safeco to refile redacted versions of these
documents with the Court.
According,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) Safeco’s Motion to Seal (Dkt. 48) is GRANTED.
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - 1
(2) The Clerk is directed to seal the documents filed at Dockets 41-3 and 41-4.
(3) Safeco is directed to re-file redacted versions of these documents. Safeco shall
work with the Clerk’s office in an effort to link the redacted filings with the
previously filed documents.
DATED: May 24, 2016
_________________________
B. Lynn Winmill
Chief Judge
United States District Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?