WildEarth Guardians v. Lannom et al

Filing 13

ORDER granting 12 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint and to Vacate Scheduling Conference and Related Deadlines. Federal Defendants' response to the Complaint will be due on 1/11/2017. The 12/7/2016 Schedu ling Conference in this case is vacated. The 12/2/2016 deadline for the parties to file a Litigation Plan and Discovery Plan is also vacated. The parties shall notify the Court of a need for a new Scheduling Conference by 1/11/2017. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, Case No.: 1:16-cv-00428-BLW Plaintiff, v. KEITH LANNOM, in his official capacity as Payette National Forest Supervisor; UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE; DANIEL ASHE, in his official capacity as Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND TO VACATE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES Defendants. This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading. Finding good cause shown, NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the motion (docket no. 12) is GRANTED. Federal Defendants’ response to the Complaint will be due on January 11, 2017. The December 7, 2016 Scheduling Conference in this case is vacated. The December 2, 2016 deadline for the parties to file a Litigation Plan and Discovery Plan is also vacated. The parties shall notify the Court of a need for a new Scheduling Conference by January 11, 2017. 1 DATED: November 22, 2016 _________________________ B. Lynn Winmill Chief Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?