Metz et al v. Rainey
JUDGMENT AND DECREE. The Clerk shall close this case and term the pending motion 4 . Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO
RICHARD C. METZ, individually and as
former Trustee of the Dick Metz Trust; and
F. ROBERT INSINGER III, Trustee of the
Dick Metz Trust,
Case No: 1:17-cv-00506-BLW
JUDGMENT AND DECREE
CHARLENE RAINEY, an individual,
Based on the written Stipulation for Entry of Judgment and Decree executed and filed by
Plaintiffs’ and Defendant’s attorneys of record herein, and this Court having accepted and
approved the same, the Court hereby enters its Judgment and Decree as follows:
NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that:
1. The Stipulation for Entry of Judgment and Decree (docket no. 16) is APPROVED.
2. The Court has personal jurisdiction over all parties, and subject matter jurisdiction over all
claims raised and which could be raised:
a. In this case; and,
b. In the Superior Court of California County of Orange Case Number 30-201700951786-CU-CO-CJC; and,
c. In the Mutual Release and Settlement Agreement attached hereto.
3. The attached Mutual Release and Settlement Agreement is hereby merged into this
Judgment and Decree.
JUDGMENT AND DECREE – Page 1
4. Pursuant to the Plaintiffs’ request for declaratory judgment, and based on the parties’
Mutual Release and Settlement Agreement, the Court hereby declares as follows:
a. No written, oral, express, or implied contract or any other legal or equitable
marriage-like or other relationship exists or previously existed between Plaintiff
Richard C. Metz and Defendant Charlene Johnson Rainey.
b. Defendant Charlene Johnson Rainey has no legal or equitable claim, right, title, or
interest in or to any real or personal property or asset of either Plaintiff Richard C.
Metz or Plaintiff Dick Metz Trust, or both.
c. Defendant Charlene Johnson Rainey has no past or present legal or equitable claim
or right to receive any financial support, maintenance or compensation from
Plaintiff Richard C. Metz or Plaintiff Dick Metz Trust.
5. This Judgment and Decree constitutes the conclusion and final adjudication of all claims
and issues addressed, raised, and which could have been raised:
a. In this case; and,
b. In the above-referenced California Superior Court action; and,
c. In the attached and merged Mutual Release and Settlement Agreement.
6. The Clerk shall close this case and term the pending motion (docket no. 4).
DATED: February 12, 2018
B. Lynn Winmill
Chief U.S. District Court Judge
JUDGMENT AND DECREE – Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?