Revelstoke Custom Homes, LLC v. Farrell et al

Filing 49

ORDER denying 48 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 48 Motion for Mediation. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by cjm)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO REVELSTOKE CUSTOM HOMES, LLC, an Idaho limited liability company, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:10-cv-00599-BLW ORDER v. TIM FARRELL and NANCY FARRELL, husband and wife; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, acting through the Rural Housing Service, an agency of the United States Department of Interior; HIGH MARK HEATING AND COOLING, LLC, an Idaho limited, liability company; BONNER CONCRETE PRODUCTS, INC., an Idaho corporations; DAVID W. BUTTERFIELD, an individual; INTERSTATE CONCRETE AND ASPHALT COMPANY, an Idaho corporation; STOCK BUILDING SUPPLY, LLC, a Utah limited liability company; EXCELL INSULATION, INC., an Idaho corporation; DECRA ROOFING & SEAMLESS RAINGUTTERS, INC., an Idaho corporation; and TODD GARRETT JANSSEN, an individual doing business as Three Amigos, Defendants. The Court has before it Revelstoke Custom Home LLC’s Motion to Deny Motion ORDER - 1 for Summary Judgment and Revelstoke Custom Homes LLC’s Motion for Order of Mediation (Dkt. 48). As explained by the Court in its earlier order, Revelstoke Custom Homes cannot appear in this matter without being represented by an attorney. Dist. Idaho Loc. Civ. R. 83.4(d). Revelstoke Custom Homes is not represented by a licensed attorney, and its motion was not properly filed by a licensed attorney. Accordingly, the Court will deny the motion. ORDER IT IS ORDERED: 1. Revelstoke Custom Home LLC’s Motion to Deny Motion for Summary Judgment and Revelstoke Custom Homes LLC’s Motion for Order of Mediation (Dkt. 48) is DENIED. DATED: January 5, 2012 B. LYNN WINMILL Chief U.S. District Court Judge ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?