Revelstoke Custom Homes, LLC v. Farrell et al
Filing
49
ORDER denying 48 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 48 Motion for Mediation. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by cjm)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO
REVELSTOKE CUSTOM HOMES,
LLC, an Idaho limited liability company,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:10-cv-00599-BLW
ORDER
v.
TIM FARRELL and NANCY
FARRELL, husband and wife; UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA, acting through
the Rural Housing Service, an agency of
the United States Department of Interior;
HIGH MARK HEATING AND
COOLING, LLC, an Idaho limited,
liability company; BONNER
CONCRETE PRODUCTS, INC., an
Idaho corporations; DAVID W.
BUTTERFIELD, an individual;
INTERSTATE CONCRETE AND
ASPHALT COMPANY, an Idaho
corporation; STOCK BUILDING
SUPPLY, LLC, a Utah limited liability
company; EXCELL INSULATION,
INC., an Idaho corporation; DECRA
ROOFING & SEAMLESS
RAINGUTTERS, INC., an Idaho
corporation; and TODD GARRETT
JANSSEN, an individual doing business
as Three Amigos,
Defendants.
The Court has before it Revelstoke Custom Home LLC’s Motion to Deny Motion
ORDER - 1
for Summary Judgment and Revelstoke Custom Homes LLC’s Motion for Order of
Mediation (Dkt. 48). As explained by the Court in its earlier order, Revelstoke Custom
Homes cannot appear in this matter without being represented by an attorney. Dist. Idaho
Loc. Civ. R. 83.4(d). Revelstoke Custom Homes is not represented by a licensed
attorney, and its motion was not properly filed by a licensed attorney. Accordingly,
the Court will deny the motion.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED:
1.
Revelstoke Custom Home LLC’s Motion to Deny Motion for Summary
Judgment and Revelstoke Custom Homes LLC’s Motion for Order of
Mediation (Dkt. 48) is DENIED.
DATED: January 5, 2012
B. LYNN WINMILL
Chief U.S. District Court Judge
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?