Perez v. Sandpoint Gas N Go & Lube Center, Inc. et al

Filing 54

ORDER. IT IS SO ORDERED Defendant Oskoui's Motion to Vacate Hearing Set for 9/25/2015, and Motion to Shorten Time 51 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Defendant may re-file a motion to vacate the hearing, no later than Monday, 9/21/2015. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO THOMAS E. PEREZ, SECRETARY OF LABOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Case No. 2:14-cv-00357-BLW ORDER Plaintiff, v. SANDPOINT GAS N GO & LUBE CENTER, INC., an Idaho corporation; and SYDNEY M. OSKOUI, an individual, Defendants. The Court has before it Defendant Oskoui’s Motion to Vacate Hearing Set for September 25th, 2015, and Motion to Shorten Time (Dkt. 51). Defendant asks the Court to vacate the hearing because he will be out of the state on the day of the hearing, and for an additional week “depending on the medical condition of his family member.” Motion to Vacate, p.1, Dkt. 51. The only specific information Defendant gives about his absence is that it would be prejudicial for him “to cancel a trip for medical purposes, in which doctors and staff are waiting for his appearance and his wife in support.” Motion to Vacate, p. 4, Dkt. 51. As is this Court’s typical practice, the Court will only vacate a hearing for medical reasons if the Court is presented with specific information about why the medical RESTITUTION ORDER - 1 condition prevents attendance at the hearing, including a doctor’s note. Accordingly, the Court will deny the motion with leave to re-file. IT IS SO ORDERED. 1. Defendant Oskoui’s Motion to Vacate Hearing Set for September 25th, 2015, and Motion to Shorten Time (Dkt. 51) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Defendant may re-file a motion to vacate the hearing, no later than Monday, September 21, 2015. The motion shall include more specific information about the medical condition and why it prevents Defendant’s appearance at the hearing. The motion shall include where the Defendant intends to be on the date of the hearing – not just “out of state.” And the motion shall include a doctor’s note about the medical condition and why it prevents Defendant from attending the September 25 hearing. Defendant may file the motion and doctor’s note ex parte and under seal if he believes the information is medically confidential. DATED: September 16, 2015 _________________________ B. Lynn Winmill Chief Judge United States District Court RESTITUTION ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?