Maddox et al v. City of Sandpoint et al

Filing 45

ORDER REGARDING PHASED DISCOVERY re 44 Stipulation. Defendants to file their motions related to the qualified immunity issue by 12/16/2016. Plaintiffs to respond by 1/13/2017 (Case Management deadline set for 12/16/2016). Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO DANA MADDOX on behalf of D. M. and D. M., and RAYMOND FOSTER on behalf of H. F., minor children and heirs of JEANETTA RILEY, deceased, Case No. 2:16-cv-00162-BLW ORDER REGARDING PHASED DISCOVERY Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF SANDPOINT, a political subdivision of the State of Idaho, CITY OF SANDPOINT POLICE DEPARTMENT, a department of the City of Sandpoint, SKYLAR CARL ZIEGLER, in his individual and official capacity, MICHAEL HENRY VALENZUELA, in his individual and official capacity, COREY COON, in his individual and official capacity, JOHN or JANE DOE #1-10 Employees of the Sandpoint Police Department, and SHANE RILEY, an heir of JEANETTA RILEY, deceased, Defendants. Based on the Stipulated Agreement on Phased Discovery (Dkt. 44), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that any discovery needed by the Plaintiffs which relates to qualified immunity will be served so that it can be answered by December 1, 2016. ORDER REGARDING PHASED DISCOVERY - 1 Defendants to file their motions related to the qualified immunity issue by December 16, 2016. Plaintiffs to respond by January 13, 2017. DATED: September 27, 2016 _________________________ B. Lynn Winmill Chief Judge United States District Court ORDER REGARDING PHASED DISCOVERY - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?