Coeur d'Alene Tribe v. Gulf Resource & Chem, et al
Filing
150
ORDER re (1611 in 3:96-cv-00122-EJL) Consent MOTION for Entry of Judgment Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion to Enter Consent Decree filed by USA; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Unopposed Motion to Enter Consent Decree(Dkt. No. 1611) is GRANTED a nd the Consent Decree lodged with this Court on June13, 2011 in this matter (Docket Nos. 1601 through 1601-13) is hereby entered.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Courts signature and entry of this orderconstitutes signature by the Court of Page 54 of t hat Consent Decree (Docket No. 1601-1)and entry of that Consent Decree as of the date of entry of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will retain jurisdiction as set forth in the Consent Decree. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, as set forth i n Paragraph 96 of the Consent Decree (Docket No. 1601-1), final judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54 and 58 is hereby entered in this matter upon entry of the Consent Decree.. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. Associated Cases: 3:96-cv-00122-EJL, 3:91-cv-00342-EJL, 2:94-0206-HLR(caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by dks)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
COEUR D’ALENE TRIBE,
STATE OF IDAHO,
Plaintiffs,
v.
HECLA LIMITED, a Delaware Corporation,
Defendant.
and CONSOLIDATED CASES.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 96-0122-N-EJL
No. 91-0342-N-EJL
No. 94-0206-N-HLR
ORDER ENTERING CONSENT
DECREE
Having considered the Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion to Enter Consent Decree
(Dkt. No. 1611) and all related filings, and having further considered the proceedings in
open court on today’s date, the Court finds that the proposed Consent Decree is fair,
reasonable, and consistent with applicable law.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Unopposed Motion to Enter Consent Decree
(Dkt. No. 1611) is GRANTED and the Consent Decree lodged with this Court on June
13, 2011 in this matter (Docket Nos. 1601 through 1601-13) is hereby entered.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court’s signature and entry of this order
constitutes signature by the Court of Page 54 of that Consent Decree (Docket No. 1601-1)
and entry of that Consent Decree as of the date of entry of this Order.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will retain jurisdiction as set forth in
the Consent Decree.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, as set forth in Paragraph 96 of the Consent
Decree (Docket No. 1601-1), final judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54 and 58 is hereby
entered in this matter upon entry of the Consent Decree.
SO ORDERED THIS 8 th DAY OF September, 2011.
Honorable Edward J. Lodge
U. S. District Judge
Order Entering Consent Decree
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?