Quicksilver Air Inc. et al v. Helicopter Engine Repair Overhaul Services et al

Filing 56

PROTECTIVE ORDER re: 53 STIPULATION FOR PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (krb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ) QUICKSILVER AIR, INC., RICHARD C. ) Case No. 3:cv-12-06-REB ) SWISHER and SHARON SWISHER, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) HELICOPTER ENGINE REPAIR ) OVERHAUL SERVICES, INC. t/a H.E.R.O.S., INC., THE TIMKEN ) COMPANY, ROLLS-ROYCE ) PROTECTIVE ORDER CORPPORATION, ) ) Defendants ) CRAIG WHITE and BETHANY WHITE, ) ) husband and wife, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) Case No. 3:cv-12-366-REB vs. ) ) ) QUICKSILVER AIR, INC., an Alaska Corporation; THE TIMKEN COMPANY, ) ) an Ohio Corporation, doing business as ) TIMKEN ALCOR AEROSPACE ) TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a foreign ) Arizona Company; H.E.R.O.S., INC., a ) California Corporation; ARROW ) AVIATION, LLC, a Louisiana Limited Liability Company; 11 AEROSPACE LLC, ) ) an Arizona Limited Liability Company, ) doing business as ASI SERVICES; ) RICHARD C. SWISHER; JOHN OR ) JANE DOES 1-X; DOE ) CORPORATIONS, XI-XX ) ) Defendants ) ) PROTECTIVE ORDER - P. 1 ) ) ) Case No. 3:cv-12-367-REB Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ) QUICKSILVER AIR, INC., an Alaska Corporation; THE TIMKEN COMPANY, ) ) an Ohio Corporation, doing business as ) TIMKEN ALCOR AEROSPACE ) TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a foreign ) Arizona Company; H.E.R.O.S., INC., a ) California Corporation; ARROW ) AVIATION, LLC, a Louisiana Limited Liability Company; 11 AEROSPACE LLC, ) ) an Arizona Limited Liability Company, ) doing business as ASI SERVICES; ) RICHARD C. SWISHER; JOHN OR ) JANE DOES 1-X; DOE ) CORPORATIONS, XI-XX ) ) Defendants. GEORGE PAULEY, PROTECTIVE ORDER Plaintiff Quicksilver Air, Inc. has requested certain business and other records of INVENTORY LOCATOR SERVICE (hereinafter “ILS”) through a federal subpoena for the purposes of Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for a lack of personal jurisdiction. The parties recognize that the documents requested may involve confidential, protected and otherwise sensitive information that are relevant to this action, and such information is to be used only for the purposes of this case and not otherwise disclosed. With respect to the production of documents by ILS, it is hereby: ORDERED that disclosure of such documents produced by ILS marked or designated “CONFIDENTIAL” shall be made subject to the following procedures and restrictions: 1. This Protective Order shall apply to any originals and/or copies of the documents. PROTECTIVE ORDER - P. 2 2. This Protective Order shall govern the parties to this case (“the Parties”), and counsel for all Parties and all their employees, including all secretaries, paralegals, or any other employee that may work on the above-captioned case (hereinafter jointly referred to as “counsel”). 3. The documents and information disclosed to the respective Parties, and their counsel pursuant to this Order shall be used for the limited purpose of this litigation, and shall not be otherwise used, distributed, published, revealed or disclosed to anyone else for any other purpose, except as permitted by this Court, and provide further that each person, other than the Parties and counsel who are subject to this Order, who review any documents covered by this Order as part of this litigation shall sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement and Affidavit affirming that they have read and agreed to comply with this Order. (A copy of the Affidavit is attached hereto as Exhibit A). Each Affidavit shall be provided and maintained in the files of counsel for each party and copies of such affidavits shall be furnished upon request to counsel for the party that has declared a document to be confidential. Counsel shall keep a log of each person (other than counsel and the parties who are already covered under this Order) who reviews any documents covered by this Order as part of this litigation and signs an Affidavit. 4. Neither the Parties nor the Parties’ counsel or representatives shall contact any of the individuals or entities reflected or identified in any customer lists provided under Paragraph 3 of this Order without first identifying to counsel for ILS each such individual or entity to be contacted, and obtaining from said counsel the express consent of ILS to each such contact, with counsel for ILS and Quicksilver agreeing upon any limitations upon the information regarding this lawsuit to be disclosed to that individual or entity during said contact. In the event that ILS does not give such consent or the parties are unable to reach such agreement on such limitations, Quicksilver may apply for a court order authorizing such contact and/or defining such limitations. PROTECTIVE ORDER - P. 3 Any contact with any person or entity identified in any documents provided under Paragraph 3 of this Order shall include disclosure of this Order’s provisions regarding confidentiality and its limitations regarding republication. Nothing in this Order forbids the Parties or their representatives from engaging in communications with any individuals or entities identified in such customer lists, in furtherance of business wholly unrelated to ILS or this lawsuit, so long as such communications do not mention ILS or this lawsuit. 5. The Parties, the Parties’ counsel and their staffs shall not disclose, directly or indirectly, the documents or any of the information contained in the documents to other attorneys not of record in this litigation. 6. If it becomes necessary for any party to include a document subject to this Protective Order as an Exhibit to a deposition, a motion or other court paper, or as an Exhibit at trial or other hearing, the parties agree to make appropriate arrangements – if practical or unless otherwise agreed upon by the parties or by the individual whose identity would otherwise be revealed by disclosure – to preserve the confidentiality of said documents, including joining in a motion for the sealing of such documents or any testimony pertaining thereto. 7. At the conclusion of this litigation, inclusive of appeals, all documents subject to this Protective Order shall be returned to ILS accompanied by the executed Affidavit of Compliance and Delivery of Documents attached hereto as Exhibit B or destroyed upon agreement by ILS. 8. After termination of this litigation, inclusive of appeals, the provisions of this Order relating to the confidentiality of the protected documents and information shall continue to be binding, except with respect to any documents or information which may have become a matter of public record. It is agreed that this Court retains jurisdiction over the parties for enforcement of the provisions of this Protective Order following final termination of this action. PROTECTIVE ORDER - P. 4 9. It is agreed that a violation by any person of any provision of this Protective Order may be punishable as contempt of court. Further, it is agreed that the aggrieved party may pursue any civil remedies available to them for a breach of this Order. 10. The Clerk shall file a copy of this Order in each of the three cases in the heading above. DATED: November 20, 2012 _________________________ B. Lynn Winmill Chief Judge United States District Court PROTECTIVE ORDER - P. 5 PROTECTIVE ORDER - P. 6 PROTECTIVE ORDER - P. 7 PROTECTIVE ORDER - P. 8 PROTECTIVE ORDER - P. 9 PROTECTIVE ORDER - P. 10

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?